Risk on Risk off ?……..I think risk off

It’s an unusual backdrop where “Risk On” powers equities markets melt-up, while safe haven assets trade as if “Risk Off” is lurking right around the corner. Ten-year Treasury yields declined 10 bps this week (to 2.31%) to the lowest level since November 29th. UK yields sank 14 bps (to 1.08%) to lows since October. Gold added $22 this week to $1,257, trading to the high since the US election. German bund yields declined a notable 12 bps this week to 0.18%, the low since December 29th. Even more intriguing, German two-year sovereign yields sank 14 bps this week to a record low negative 0.96%.

Consider this

1.Last week US treasury secretary pushed the deadline for tax reforms to august and there is no sight of promised infrastructure spending .Equity markets had build hopes around it

2. Trump reflation was further fuelled by massive credit expansion till january by china which lead to huge rally in commodities. chart below shows that chinese M1 is collapsing which is warning signal for commodities

on top of that Jeff currie wrote this to his clients

Below chart is dollar and gold. normally dollar and gold have inverse relationship and are considered as risk off trade. When you look at the chart below both dollar and gold are rallying simultaneously…. double risk off???

and this was as per marketwatch on 24th feb

“Treasury yields touched their lowest levels in more than five weeks on Friday, cementing their largest weekly decline since December, as President Donald Trump offered no new details about his plans for implementing his sweeping economic policy promises.The yield on the 10-year Treasury note TMUBMUSD10Y, +0.73% dropped 7.1 basis points on Friday, and 10.8 basis points this week, to finish at 2.317%, its lowest day-end level since Nov. 29. The yield on the 30-year bond TMUBMUSD30Y, +0.35% shed seven basis points on Friday, and 7.7 basis points this week, to end at 2.953%, its lowest day-end level since Jan. 17”

So Trump has not offered new spending plans which led to scramble in equities, chinese M1 is collapsing which is a warning to commodities rally , treasury yields are falling and the curve is flattening inspite of record short positions, both gold and Dollar rallying at same point of time, very rare…..Hmmm somewhere smart guys are bailing out of this reflation trade.

So what looks good if this reflation trade is close to unwinding?

LONG DATED US TREASURIES

Millionaire Migrants: Countries That Rich People Are Flocking To

Money may not buy happiness, but it does buy the ultimate flexibility for making financial and lifestyle decisions.

For many of the world’s millionaires, money provides a highly effective means to escape their home country when times get tough. They can pack their bags, and move their family and capital to a location that will provide superior opportunities for prosperity.

According to a new report by New World Wealth, this couldn’t have been truer for 2016, as the amount of millionaire migrants increased by 28% from the previous year.

HUMAN AND CAPITAL FLIGHT

In 2016, there were a total of 82,000 millionaire migrants that left for greener pastures.

The Top Five Countries (Net Outflows)

Country   2016       2015     Change
1 France -12,000 -10,000    20%
2 China   -9,000    -9,000    0%
3 Brazil   -8,000    -2,000     300%
4 India    -6,000     -4,000    50%
5 Turkey -6,000     -1000     500%
France tops the list for a second straight year, as rich people dodge conditions that they consider to be adverse. France has rising religious tensions and populism, but it also has a tax system that is not particularly friendly to the ultra rich. The International Business Times calls the ongoing problem a “Millionaire Exodus”.

China and India both continue to have net outflows of millionaires, but two of the more interesting countries on this list are Brazil and Turkey.

The Top Five Countries (Net Inflows)

Country              2016       2015        Increase
1 Australia         +11,000  +8,000   38%
2 USA                 +10,000 +7,000   43%
3 Canada            +8,000  +5,000    60%
4 UAE                 +5,000  +3,000    67%
5 New Zealand  +4,000  +2,000    100%
In 2016, Australia was the number one destination for millionaire migrants, with the United States and Canada being close behind.

 

Negative Relationship between Rupee and Cash

Higher currency in circulation in last few years has led to higher demand pull inflation. High inflation if not tackled by high interest rates leads to erosion in value of currency.In the accompanying chart you can see there is a direct correlation beetween currency in circulation as % of M1 and nominal exchange rates. Since currency in circulation has never come down before nov 8 ( demonetisation), Rupee has continued to depreciate against dollar.

The correlation is so tight that by looking at the chart you can infer that even if half of currency deposited with banking system post demonetisation does not come back into circulation than Rupee nominal exchange rate will appreciate rather than perpetual depreciation that we are so used to.On the other hand if bigger portion of the money deposited with banking system post demonetisation is withdrawn it could possibly lead  to higher inflation and in turn depreciating rupee.

RBI changed its stance on monetary policy to neutral from accomodative against market expectation. Are they anticipating that most of this money will leak out of banking system?

Subsidizing Capital at the Expense of Labor: Unintended Consequences of low interest rates

The mandate of a central bank is normally “the goals of maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates.” These goals are known today as the “dual mandate.”
Of course, the Fed’s tools for achieving the dual mandate were the setting of short term interest rates and market operations that impacted interest rates. Most of the time over the past 40 years the Fed has kept interest rates low with an intact trend of ever lower rates (with every cycle experiencing lower lows and lower highs). This has resulted in an enormous mountain of debt that now requires even more continuously low interest rates to avoid undue financial stress.
Surely one unintended consequence of these lower rates is an increasing subsidy of capital relative to labor. As interest rates get lower the relative attractiveness of investment over labor increases. Although the official unemployment rate shows near full employment, more broad based measures show that employment among many parts of the population is persistently much lower now than it has been in the past.

Businesses use the key inputs of capital and labor to grow. Managers must choose the optimal mix from among these factors. Both cost money. However, the Fed’s low interest rate policy is a subsidy to capital, making it cheaper relative to the cost of unsubsidized labor. In fact, labor is taxed (payroll taxes, income taxes, etc.) making it further relatively unattractive. So it should be little surprise that the returns to labor have been suffering relative to the returns on capital and thus labor is suffering. It seems it is not easy to achieve the dual mandate.
Robots are the Labor Saving Capital of the Future
Robotics and automation are the forms of capital most likely to be used to substitute labor. This is because the technologies necessary for game changing robotics and automation are all seemingly approaching the critical mass required for transformative change and wide scale commercial adoption. Many of these companies are leaders in the technologies necessary to make a unified robotic product or in the specialized application of a more narrow, but powerful, solution. A number of key technologies include 1.) computing and processing functions necessary to enable robots to work independently, 2.) “thinking” by artificial intelligence, algorithms, and machine learning, 3.) sensing information about the environment such as through visual mapping, GPS technology, and highly sensitive grips, 4.) directing the movement of the machine, and 5.) the integration of all these necessary steps into a fully functioning whole.
As Lewis Johnson writes in Trend and Tail Risks…….We should seriously heed Nils Bohr’s warning about the difficulty of prediction when it comes to the future. But an idea that one cannot stop pondering is the close relationship between stock market indices and industrial production. There has been a near 90% correlation over the last 100 years between the two in the United States. This close correlation makes intuitive sense given the extreme importance of companies driving long-term productivity growth to industrial production and thus living standards. Such companies in aggregate are the stock market. This realization helps us find comfort in an uncertain and rapidly changing world. When that future day arrives and we truly do find ourselves in a profoundly robotic world, could the accompanying productivity boom drive industrial production to levels that may shock even the bulls? The time between then and now may be very long indeed, or it may be far closer than we think. The prospect is surely one worth pondering. Given the stakes, we intend to keep an open mind!

Global Trade disaster in charts

Only the third time since 2000 has global trade growth dipped below 2%. On both prior occasions, the US economy was in recession.

There is a correlation between policy uncertainty and trade growth. Higher the policy uncertainty lower is the Trade growth. Guess what, 2017 started with highest ever policy uncertainty.

In 2010 there were 464 trade-restrictive measures on deck.
In 2016 there were 2238 trade trade-restrictive measures on deck.

World trade was already slowing before Trump became president http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/228941487594148537/pdf/112930-REVISED-PUBLIC.pdf. The new wave of policy uncertainty and trade protectionism does not bode well for Global trade.

 

Hormegeddon… what happens when you have too much of a good thing

“Hormegeddon”- book review
If you add a little bit of poison to yeast, the yeast grows better. This is “hormesis”: A little of something is good, but if you add a lot of it, that extra can be bad. You need food every day, but if you eat too much, you could get fat and develop diabetes or heart trouble. Exercise, sex, you name it, almost everything is “subject to the law of declining marginal utility.”
“The idea that government’s mission is to make things better is false. Government is best understood as a naturally occurring struggle between the outsiders and the insiders.”
Hormegeddon is “what happens when you have too much of a good thing in a public policy context.” Governments create “public policy disasters” when they apply “rational, small-scale problem-solving logic” to “inappropriately broad” situations. Then, these situations move from being fine to escalating gradually into full-blown disasters. Policy makers create hormegeddons when they apply reasoning to “large scale planning” and support it with armed force. Government involvement disrupts the feedback loop – in which trouble tells you something is wrong and needs fixing – and prevents society from learning from the feedback. One side effect is the creation of a class of people who benefit from a disaster.

“There is no faster path to disaster than enthusiastic leadership.”
Too Much Government, Too Much Safety…
You often hear that society needs more or better leaders. Actually, the opposite is true. You don’t need more leaders; you need fewer, because you don’t need a leader to get things done. Leaders waste your time and money. You already know what you want. You want to have your swimming pool fixed. “You want to figure out how to play All of Me on the guitar and how to make beef bourguignon on the stove.” Who needs a leader for that?

“That’s what leadership is all about – solemn and pompous lying.”
That’s as true for businesses as it is for society in general. CEOs claim all the glory, but they don’t understand how their companies work. They make flashy strategic decisions and drive their firms down the wrong roads. To be a leader is to be a liar. The greatest leaders are “those who do it most grandly.” Consider Abraham Lincoln. “Without his leadership, the US would have probably split apart, which is to say the southern states would have been permitted to exercise their right to self-determination.” The south simply wanted to do as the 13 colonies had done, “badly misgovern themselves rather than to be misgoverned by some foreign entity.”

“Rather than self-limiting, public policy disasters are self-perpetuating. They create ‘zombies.’ That is, people who gain from wealth-destroying activities.”
Most people misunderstand the purpose of government and think it exists to make things better. Government is an ongoing “struggle between insiders and outsiders,” in which insiders use government to shore up existing hierarchies and “exploit the outsiders.” Everyone wants to be rich and powerful, and many people want to dominate others. That’s human nature. The easiest way to take such power over others and bring profits to yourself is to become a leader, institute a government and impose your views in the name of order. Government can shape laws to help you keep your wealth and status. Sometimes religion gets involved.

“It is not because barbarism is evil that people turned away from it. On the contrary, it is because it is unprofitable.”
…And Not Enough Security
A particular modern misapprehension about the state is that government can and should make you more secure. Governments can redistribute wealth but can’t create it: Any attempts to make you more secure will cost you – and will fail. The people who run these programs always take a cut. The free market could do a better job more cheaply.

“‘We never know what we are talking about,’ cautioned English philosopher Karl Popper. He had a point.”
The American “war on terror” is a vivid example. The US once had an enemy: the Soviet Union. It was large, aggressive and armed with nuclear weapons. However, the USSR renounced communism in 1989 and no longer exists. Still, American military spending has doubled, without a real foe. The Pentagon’s budget continues to increase, but the battles the US fights don’t make the country any safer. Through clumsy use of force, these conflicts make America less safe by creating more resentment worldwide. The only thing war secures is increased government spending.

“Central planning can do a good job of imitating real progress, at least in the short run.”
Ineffective Corrections
The free market is the real world in which individuals suffer from their mistakes. When you make a bad investment, you lose money. If you’re lucky, you survive and learn. You don’t develop your muscles or your mind by taking things easy. The feedback from challenges is what teaches you how to correct your actions in the future.

“Nobody attracts readers or speaking fees by telling the world there is nothing that can be done. Instead, they meddle. They plan. They tinker.”
Government actively disrupts market attempts to correct its actions. If you take on debt, you economize to make up for it. Most people who experience money trouble fall into a “liquidity trap” or a “debt trap,” which is harder to escape. To help, the government keeps the interest rates on loans artificially low. People borrow and don’t have to correct their earlier errors. This happened in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis. Instead of letting badly run businesses crash, the government bailed them out. This only delayed addressing the initial problem.

Where Zombies Walk
Inserting government planning into a healthy economy produces an almost supernaturally bad effect. Where once you had people, you now have “zombies” – “people who live at the expense of others.” Zombies once were productive members of society, but they found a home in the state apparatus. They benefit from increasingly complex regulations and from the armed power of the government forcing its citizens to follow those regulations. Zombies work the system for themselves, such as when regulators arrange for companies to get contracts and then take lucrative positions with those firms. Sometimes zombies consume entire businesses. The government insured big US banks that were “too big to fail,” which became zombies. Your taxes guarantee bank profits and bankers don’t suffer for their bad investments.

Health Care Hormegeddon
The American health care system is a classic case of hormegeddon. Some health care steps – exercising, watching your diet and getting clear diagnoses – and some public health measures, such as sanitation systems, are useful. But in modern medicine, the insurance companies or the government pay for medical care. Doctors aren’t spending their patients’ money, so they order more tests or refer you to specialists, which only increases the cost of treatment. Pharmaceutical firms now advertise directly to consumers, and drug sales have increased “six times faster than the population.” Drug testing is unscientific and biased toward positive results. Labs test drugs in isolation, yet people take multiple medications at once. Combine unhealthy drug reactions, cross-infections and simple hospital accidents, and the result is “225,000 unintended deaths” annually. Your doctor is 2,000 times more apt to kill you than a terrorist is.

Debt Burdens
When governments interfere in the economy, they go into debt. Once they go into debt, they keep doing as they’ve always done and the debt becomes bigger and more dangerous. Debt is not always bad, even longstanding debt that you can’t repay immediately. Debt was part of human society when people lived in small tribal units. It predates market economies and money. In ancient societies, people did favors for one another and then owed each other. Primitive civilizations kept track of their specific debts. What worked on a small scale doesn’t work well in larger, market-based societies, where people don’t know each other.

“Bullion-based money,” especially gold, replaced debt. Bullion-based currency limits how much total currency and debt can exist. But for that to work, you have to be able to redeem money or debts with gold. That ended in 1971, when President Richard Nixon took the United States off the gold standard. Today, money isn’t based on anything. This means economists can manipulate the money supply and governments might print more money, generating inflation. With seemingly endless lines of credit, people borrow to get what they want and spend money they don’t have. This is evident everywhere in America’s economy today.

If individuals overextend their budgets, it’s unfortunate, but it doesn’t have widespread consequences. That’s not true for a national government, especially one in charge of the world’s largest economy. This unanchored debt pushes today’s problem down the road as America borrows from future generations. The debt problem will grow, and a manageable issue will become a disaster. This is a typical hormegeddon.

Capital flow favors equities

Excess savings in the form of capital typically has 3 places to live. (Dont insult me by asking where is real estate in this matrix)

Think of these as investment buckets, where you will keep your investments in the most favourable bucket or buckets at any one time.
In a stable goldilocks economy where inflation is neither too high nor too low, where debt is low and manageable, and where faith in currency is not in question we could argue that investors would be OK with the above setup.
What about when inflation is rising sharply? How do investors re-allocate?
Simplistically, like this:

How about a strong deflationary environment?
Simplistically like this:

Now, I only look at capital flows when investing my money and one thing I’ve learned over the last 20 odd years in finance is that capital flows are extremely important and have become increasingly important as globalisation has taken hold. Europe is on precipice and uncertainty rising, not falling. A blow up in Europe, which looks more and more inevitable with each passing day, will see capital flee.
This will have to go somewhere, and so much of it will first go into US treasuries causing the dollar to strengthen and then it will head into equities .This will stoke fears of inflation and the Fed who are way behind the curve already will scurry to catch up, raising rates. Ironically, raising rates will further exacerbate the spreads between US and non-US paper causing more capital to head to the US, creating a self-perpetuating cycle.
Note that this capital flowing into the US will have nothing to do with US corporate profits and none of this will really have anything to do with policies enacted by the Trump administration.
I see the same thing playing out in India where demonetisation and positive real rates have killed the “I only invest in real estate” argument, RBI has decided that currency is more important than interest rates hence decided to change the policy guidance to neutral (loud and clear no more interest rates cuts) and globally inflation is rising which will show up in domestic inflation ……. Early stages of inflation is good only for one asset class and that means equities is the only game left till the time inflation does not turn into stagflation.
This is when gold will turn into the best performing asset class (I must confess here I am a gold bug). Don’t want to leave my hard-earned money in the hands of few academics who run central bank.
Aaaand so….
Is the US and Indian equity market overvalued? Yes!
There are many pieces to this puzzle and I don’t pretend to know them all or how they will interact with one another.
What I do know is that capital flows often overwhelm any “fundamental valuations” (I never believed in fundamentals anyway, only flows matter) .
Wait for a correction in equities but don’t run when you get one

The $74 Trillion Economy in one chart

The latest GDP numbers from the World Bank were released earlier this month, and today’s visualization from HowMuch.net breaks them down to show the relative share of the global economy for each country.

The full circle, represents the entirety of the $74 trillion global economy in nominal terms. Meanwhile, each country’s segment is sized accordingly to their percentage of global GDP output. Continents are also grouped together and sorted by color.

Here is the data for the Top 10 Countries in table form with India at number 7

Rank Country GDP (Nominal, 2015) Share of Global Economy (%)
#1 United States $18.0 trillion 24.3%
#2 China $11.0 trillion 14.8%
#3 Japan $4.4 trillion 5.9%
#4 Germany $3.4 trillion 4.5%
#5 United Kingdom $2.9 trillion 3.9%
#6 France $2.4 trillion 3.3%
#7 India $2.1 trillion 2.8%
#8 Italy $1.8 trillion 2.5%
#9 Brazil $1.8 trillion 2.4%
#10 Canada $1.6 trillion 2.1%

Half the world stock markets are now in bull market

We are close to touching a new high in Indian equities. But do you know that more than half of worlds stock market are currently in bull market. How do we define a bull market, one rule of thumb is that a bull market is when the price is up more than 20% v/s 52 week low,and a bear market is when the price is down more than 20%.Looking at the chart, you may notice a few things.

First is the indicator really fires up at the start of a bull market e.g. 2003, 2009, and again around the start of the QE rally. Second, it goes low, like almost to zero, at a major market bottom (e.g. at the end of 2015). Third and final – the MSCI ACWI (All Countries World Index) in local currency terms just made a new all time high last week. What does that add up to? In opinion of Callus Thomas, the new bull market for global equities.

I agree that equities is the best asset to invest for next couple of years but i see  excessive bullishness and compacency currently across markets as measured by VIX and explained in this article http://worldoutofwhack.com/2017/02/20/volatility-to-hit-back-with-vengeance/,  if you are patient investor keep your powder dry and you will get better levels to invest.