The forgotten Lessons of 2008

Seth Klarman describes 20 lessons from the financial crisis which, he says, “were either never learned or else were immediately forgotten by most market participants.”

The Forgotten Lessons of 2008
One might have expected that the near-death experience of most investors in 2008 would generate valuable lessons for the future. We all know about the “depression mentality” of our parents and grandparents who lived through the Great Depression. Memories of tough times colored their behavior for more than a generation, leading to limited risk taking and a sustainable base for healthy growth. Yet one year after the 2008 collapse, investors have returned to shockingly speculative behavior. One state investment board recently adopted a plan to leverage its portfolio – specifically its government and high-grade bond holdings – in an amount that could grow to 20% of its assets over the next three years. No one who was paying attention in 2008 would possibly think this is a good idea.
Below, we highlight the lessons that we believe could and should have been learned from the turmoil of 2008. Some of them are unique to the 2008 melt- down; others, which could have been drawn from general market observation over the past several decades, were certainly reinforced last year. Shockingly, virtually all of these lessons were either never learned or else were immediately forgotten by most market participants.
Twenty Investment Lessons of 2008
1.Things that have never happened before are bound to occur with some regularity. You must always be prepared for the unexpected, including sudden, sharp downward swings in markets and the economy. Whatever adverse scenario you can contemplate, reality can be far worse.
2.When excesses such as lax lending standards become widespread and persist for some time, people are lulled into a false sense of security, creating an even more dangerous situation. In some cases, excesses migrate beyond regional or national borders, raising the ante for investors and governments. These excesses will eventually end, triggering a crisis at least in proportion to the degree of the excesses. Correlations between asset classes may be surprisingly high when leverage rapidly unwinds.
3.Nowhere does it say that investors should strive to make every last dollar of potential profit; consideration of risk must never take a backseat to return. Conservative positioning entering a crisis is crucial: it enables one to maintain long-term oriented, clear thinking, and to focus on new opportunities while others are distracted or even forced to sell. Portfolio hedges must be in place before a crisis hits. One cannot reliably or affordably increase or replace hedges that are rolling off during a financial crisis.
4.Risk is not inherent in an investment; it is always relative to the price paid. Uncertainty is not the same as risk. Indeed, when great uncertainty – such as in the fall of 2008 – drives securities prices to especially low levels, they often become less risky investments.
5.Do not trust financial market risk models. Reality is always too complex to be accurately modeled. Attention to risk must be a 24/7/365 obsession, with people – not computers – assessing and reassessing the risk environment in real time. Despite the predilection of some analysts to model the financial markets using sophisticated mathematics, the markets are governed by behavioral science, not physical science.
6.Do not accept principal risk while investing short-term cash: the greedy effort to earn a few extra basis points of yield inevitably leads to the incurrence of greater risk, which increases the likelihood of losses and severe illiquidity at precisely the moment when cash is needed to cover expenses, to meet commitments, or to make compelling long-term investments.
7.The latest trade of a security creates a dangerous illusion that its market price approximates its true value. This mirage is especially dangerous during periods of market exuberance. The concept of “private market value” as an anchor to the proper valuation of a business can also be greatly skewed during ebullient times and should always be considered with a healthy degree of skepticism.
8.A broad and flexible investment approach is essential during a crisis. Opportunities can be vast, ephemeral, and dispersed through various sectors and markets. Rigid silos can be an enormous disadvantage at such times.
9.You must buy on the way down. There is far more volume on the way down than on the way back up, and far less competition among buyers. It is almost always better to be too early than too late, but you must be prepared for price markdowns on what you buy.
10.Financial innovation can be highly dangerous, though almost no one will tell you this. New financial products are typically created for sunny days and are almost never stress-tested for stormy weather. Securitization is an area that almost perfectly fits this description; markets for securitized assets such as subprime mortgages completely collapsed in 2008 and have not fully recovered. Ironically, the government is eager to restore the securitization markets back to their pre-collapse stature.
11.Ratings agencies are highly conflicted, unimaginative dupes. They are blissfully unaware of adverse selection and moral hazard. Investors should never trust them.
12.Be sure that you are well compensated for illiquidity – especially illiquidity without control – because it can create particularly high opportunity costs.
13.At equal returns, public investments are generally superior to private investments not only because they are more liquid but also because amidst distress, public markets are more likely than private ones to offer attractive opportunities to average down.
14.Beware leverage in all its forms. Borrowers – individual, corporate, or government – should always match fund their liabilities against the duration of their assets. Borrowers must always remember that capital markets can be extremely fickle, and that it is never safe to assume a maturing loan can be rolled over. Even if you are unleveraged, the leverage employed by others can drive dramatic price and valuation swings; sudden unavailability of leverage in the economy may trigger an economic downturn.
15.Many LBOs are man-made disasters. When the price paid is excessive, the equity portion of an LBO is really an out-of-the-money call option. Many fiduciaries placed large amounts of the capital under their stewardship into such options in 2006 and 2007.
16.Financial stocks are particularly risky. Banking, in particular, is a highly lever- aged, extremely competitive, and challenging business. A major European bank recently announced the goal of achieving a 20% return on equity (ROE) within several years. Unfortunately, ROE is highly dependent on absolute yields, yield spreads, maintaining adequate loan loss reserves, and the amount of leverage used. What is the bank’s management to do if it cannot readily get to 20%? Leverage up? Hold riskier assets? Ignore the risk of loss? In some ways, for a major financial institution even to have a ROE goal is to court disaster.
17.Having clients with a long-term orientation is crucial. Nothing else is as important to the success of an investment firm.
18.When a government official says a problem has been “contained,” pay no attention.
19.The government – the ultimate short- term-oriented player – cannot with- stand much pain in the economy or the financial markets. Bailouts and rescues are likely to occur, though not with sufficient predictability for investors to comfortably take advantage. The government will take enormous risks in such interventions, especially if the expenses can be conveniently deferred to the future. Some of the price-tag is in the form of back- stops and guarantees, whose cost is almost impossible to determine.
20.Almost no one will accept responsibility for his or her role in precipitating a crisis: not leveraged speculators, not willfully blind leaders of financial institutions, and certainly not regulators, government officials, ratings agencies or politicians.

Rising regulatory & political burden – How will corporates respond

Macquaire  writes on an important issue which is not only leading to creation of oligopolies but listed companies also going private

He writes ………
Corporates are confronting a rising tide of regulatory and political activism It is driven by durable factors. Public sector, technology & social media rule.  Corporates are adjusting. Replacing CEOs, getting-out of the limelight, faster
technology deployment and going private to be the main strategies.Most small and medium corporates do not have sufficient bandwidth in their executive ranks to understand and adapt to these changes. Hence pricing power and revenues are consolidating at the top of the pyramid than flowing down as should happen in normal economic recovery.

While for economists, ‘a job is a job’, people correctly feel that they are losing marginal utility and pricing power. The same is occurring on the corporate side, with the erosion of corporate pricing power forcing an ever-vigilant focus on cost control, while pushing hard for technology based solutions. And we must continue to financialize by creating more capital than needed, which aggravates wealth inequalities, keeps excesses and further accelerates the deployment of disruptive technologies. In equities, investors argue that EPSg rates are still good as are ROEs, as if the market ever discounted EPS recessions. Perhaps more importantly, investors do not inhabit a fundamental world driven by private market signals, rather it is the world determined by social media and public sector responses. We also have by now integrated technology so deeply that in most developed markets, 75-85% of trading is done via AI, computer trading & ETFs, which amply explains rapid asset re-pricings that quickly turn into avalanches.

Victor sees four key trends and explains that corporates should deploy following strategies

(a) ‘localization’ (‘global’ is to have a target on your back)– (globalization is over guys)

(b) more rapid technological deployment to offset inefficiencies- (large corporates are on stronger footing)

(c) rotation of CEOs from business to political managers; and

(d) corporates going private (as public markets become less efficient and more regulated). (sadly this will happen to reduce constant public scrutiny and will also bring down the investible universe)

The question is whether this is a recipe for higher productivity? The answer is no, but it is a process not an abrupt shift. While we maintain that nothing is safe and there is no longer any predictable sector rotation, as disorientation grows, staying with secular themes should remain the best strategy.

Invest; do not trade volatility.

Kondratiev Winter and IL&FS Default

Nicolai Kondratiev was 46 when he was executed. Nikolai(sometimes written Kondratieff) died in 1938 in the Russian gulag. So who was he and why would he even be thought about today?

Kondratiev was a Russian agriculture economist who, while working on a five-year plan for the development of Soviet agriculture, published his first book, The Major Economic Cycles, in 1925. Over the following years he carried out more research during visits to Britain, Germany, Canada and the United States.

In his book and in a series of other publications he outlined what later became known as “Kondratiev Waves”. These were observations of a series of supercycles, long surges, K-Waves or long economic cycles of alternating booms and depressions or of periods of strong growth offset by periods of slow growth in capitalist societies. These waves or cycles were at the time calculated to last from 50 to 60 years, or roughly a human lifetime in those days.Kondratiev applied his theories to capitalist societies, most notably to the US from the time of the American Revolution. His undoing came in 1928 when he published his Study of Business Activity in the Soviet Union that came to much the same cycle conclusions for the Soviet economy that he had noted for capitalist societies. He fell out of favour with Josef Stalin, who saw his treatise as criticism. Kondratiev was arrested and following a series of trials he was banished to the gulag, where he died.

The four stages are of Kondratiev winter represented in the chart below

The fourth part “WINTER” reminds me of ILFS default. https://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/il-fs-tells-staff-financial-mess-due-to-rs16-000cr-stuck-funds-118091201070_1.html.

Like four seasons and four stages of Life which happens on clockwork , “WINTER” is the part of Kondatriev cycle which every economy goes through. Years of easy global liquidity by central bankers did not allow the debts to be purged, on the contrary more debt is taken for unviable investment creating systemic risks and when one part of this credit chain is broken it spills over to entire financial system.

The chart below explains “what happened”

Connecting the Dots

1 Donald Trump cut taxes ( he wants to make America great again)—- (which lead to)

2.To take advantage of tax cuts, US corporations repatriate Dollar stashed/invested abroad ——–(which led to)

3.More Demand for dollar vs other currencies——-(which led to)

4. Fall in currencies (mainly EM) which had to supply dollar——(which led to)

5. Indiscriminate selling of local asset (read EM)to fulfill dollar demand —–(which led to)

6.Strengthening of Dollar vs these currencies

and finally this dollar which came back home had to be invested somewhere right?

The repatriated dollar went straight into stock buybacks leading to artificial demand for US stocks and that is why US market continues to be strong whereas all others are clearly struggling.

Now comes the 64 million (Dollar) question ……………………………..Is the pain over?

My view …no not at all…. this is the first time Americans don’t give a shit to what’s happening in rest of the world and happy to use Dollar as a weapon till it does not turn on them.

The market support is on shaky grounds

Dhananjay writes in a report ….The 71% yoy decline in net sales of equity mutual funds in Aug’18 epitomizes the cyclical nature of Equity MF flows, aligning with our year ago thesis. The sustenance of negative NAVs of equity MFs is a risk for the broader market. The broader market has seen a steep correction, but a capitulation is still some time away.
Considering also the RBI data on household savings, there is little evidence of a structural rise in financial savings of households.

Moderate increase in Household financial savings
Net financial savings of households, net of financial liabilities, increased only modestly in FY18 to 7.1% of disposable income, after declining to 6.7% in FY17 due to the demonetization shock. It was still much lower than 8.1% in FY16. Importantly, gross financial assets, excluding currency holdings, actually declined to 8.3% of disposable income, much lower than the pre demonetization average of 9.3%. Ironically, the holding of currency in financial assets of households jumped to 2.8% of disposable income in FY18, higher than the pre-demonetization level of 1.6% in FY16.

Broader market has seen a steep correction, but capitulation still some time away
The recent catch-up rally in the broader market with the benchmark indices after a decline of 17-20% earlier this year is possibly difficult to sustain. Even after the decline in mid-cap index trailing PE from 51x in Dec’17 to the current 39x in Aug’18, it is still trading at a 56% premium to the benchmark Sensex and Nifty indices. The risk is that it can go back to an average discount of 12-15%, instead of premium, as it existed prior to May’14.

Macro headwinds like higher risk-free rates, moderating global liquidity, INR depreciation, and uncertainty ahead of the general election in 2019 are likely to keep retail investor risk-taking appetite modest, thereby affecting valuation
multiples. This will possibly overpower the cyclical improvement in earnings growth due to currency depreciation and better consumption demand.

 

Will India remain a safe harbour in Global storm?

Victor Shvets who, along with market consensus, is overweight Indian Equities writes…..
India might become the focus of investors’ concerns…… . If EM equities continue to come under pressure, it is quite possible that it would be India that would deliver the next sharp pain jolt to investors. MSCI India has actually outperformed by ~5.5%, and together with Thai & Taiwan, it has been one of the best markets. India is where investors are hiding from a storm (trade and liquidity. while there are reasons to stay long, environment is changing.

The positives

India is a much larger (approximating the entire ASEAN) and deeper market. Second, while still poorly governed, it is becoming better administered, and from a very low base, India thus has been delivering strong growth while inflation has been range-bound. Third, India does not like when commodities are too high or too low; it needs ‘goldilocks’ and this is what investors had experienced. Fourth, India cannot tolerate extreme USD volatilities, and until several months ago, it benefited from low FX volatilities. Fifth, it is largely a domestically oriented economy, and in a world of disruption, it is perceived as a safe haven. Sixth, India has considerable accumulated liquidity, and foreigners are not large in its bond market (~5% vs 30-40% for Mal or Indo).

However, the environment is changing. First, FX volatilities are rising, and INR is coming under strong pressure.

( yeah right it was accident waiting to happen when there is loose talks from Ministry officials)

Second, rapidly declining currency is usually not a recipe for improved competitiveness but rather higher inflation; and this is occurring at the time when inflation rates have already been picking up over the last twelve months.

( spot on! I don’t understand why Fund Managers don’t get  that rates are gonna rise)

Third, India is running high twin-deficits (~9% of GDP). (get it guys, this kind of deficit is not sustainable for an Emerging economy. You cannot just spend by borrowing more)

Fourth, net FDIs are down from an annualized pace of $40bn to ~US$29-30bn. ( yes FDI is better than FPI flows, at least we get to keep those dollars)

Fifth, RBI is behind the curve, and is likely to further tighten, which, depending on volatilities, could be faster than market expects. (absolutely, growth will be sacrificed because demand needs to be curtailed)

Sixth, India is going into national electoral cycle, which is never good news for either tactical or secular reforms.         (more tactical than secular)

Seventh, equity investors remain exceptionally bullish, with EPS growth estimates in a 15-20% range per annum for three years forward while valuation multiples are more than one standard deviation above the mean.( how will you achieve 15-20% EPS growth if RBI is going to curtail final demand… you simply cannot)

Conclusion

Finally Victor is nervous but he is still positive on India

(remember his KRA is  to beat benchmark not deliver absolute returns inspite of market which is overvalued to the extent of 1 standard deviation from mean) .We are nervous and it is possible that India might be the next shoe to drop. However, what would replace India? Neither Indonesia nor china although he remains strong believers in China’s LT secular drivers. In the meantime, India’s external risks seem contained while its corporates are some of the best in the region ..

In addition, unlike other EMs, India retains the promise of sustained productivity gains.

Charts That Matter- Vol 23

1.Emerging Markets including India are facing a double whammy of falling domestic currency and stable or rising crude oil prices in US Dollar. This is the simple reason that prices at Pump keep rising on daily basis.

2.The chart by Moody….. according to them India is expanding but also that balance sheet repair is underway. The global liquidity is shrinking fast, which means India might not have enough time left to clean Banking system. The result could be slowing of Indian economy by early next year.

3.It was a matter of time. Global trade activity is finally slowing down. This is Bad for India because our exports are more sensitive to global trade growth than our imports.

4.Net inflows into domestic mutual funds slowed down to a five-month low in August because of uncertainty in the markets.Data from the Association of Mutual Funds of India (AMFI) showed that net equity inflows saw a steady decline, slipping 11.39% to ₹8,375 crore in August. Equity mutual fund schemes saw an infusion of ₹9,452 crore in July.
However, redemption pressures from mutual funds’ equity schemes also increased in August, jumping 35% as investors opted for profit booking with the markets scaling record highs.

Current Account Deficit at 2.4% of GDP

Key Points
The shortfall represented 2.4 percent of gross domestic product, worse than January-March’s 1.9 percent of GDP, the Reserve Bank of India said in a statement in Mumbai on Friday. It was at $15 billion during the same period last year, or 2.5 percent of GDP
The widening of the CAD on a year-on-year basis was primarily on account of a higher trade deficit at $45.7 billion as compared with $41.9 billion a year ago, the RBI said

 

The better than expected reading was on account of higher remittances which grew 16.9%YoY and stood at US$18.8 bn. Higher remittances can be attributed to robust global growth and a pickup in crude oil prices. (remittances from Middle east will continue to be strong till oil prices remain high) Services receipts grew 2.1% YoY supported by software and financial services and stood at US$18.7 bn. Services receipts however declined from US$20.2 bn in the previous quarter.

The balance of payments deficit for Q1FY19 stood at US$11.3 bn largely on the back of FPI outflows of US$8.1 bn ( they are not going to return in a hurry unless US FED reverse course on balance sheet unwinding and stop raising rates) FDI stood at US$9.7 bn , up 36% YoY but still insufficient to offset portfolio outflows ( this is our weak spot and we realise the importance of FDI only when currency becomes volatile). Nirmal Bang expect the CAD for FY19 to be in the range of 2.6-3.0% of GDP, with a BoP deficit of over US$30 bn (too high in current global liquidity squeeze).

India’s twin deficits (fiscal and current account) are likely to keep the INR under pressure as EM contagion risks abound, in an era of quantitative tightening. Central bank might also have to raise the rates more than warranted at the current stage of economic cycle to slowdown the economy and curtail some imported demand