It’s the Supply Chain, Stupid-Craig Shapiro

Deglobalization has been accelerated by Covid and exacerbated further by rising geopolitical tensions. This dynamic, which threatens the hegemony of the $, will usher in an era of building multiple / duplicative / repetitive supply chains and the prioritization of resource/commodity procurement at any price by governments focusing on their domestic citizens over global affairs. Governments, particularly those with deteriorating polling data, will prioritize access to resources, especially energy and food, over other agendas. Manufacturers from across the world are showing continued desire toward reshoring production at home, acquiring inputs from domestic suppliers or producing more parts in house. Rising transportation costs are helping to accelerate the shift away from global value chains as well with container and shipping costs rising massively during the pandemic and remaining sticky on the high side even as the worse congestion shortages have started to ease. With rising wage costs abroad in previously low wage cost countries, the advantages of offshoring manufacturing as being whittled away at the same time the realization that onshoring production reduces a country’s vulnerability to global supply shocks is becoming more apparent. These deglobalization dynamics will be a significant inflationary headwind to offset the structural deflationary tailwinds of demographics and technology that we have had for 40+ years.

This environment challenges the conventional thinking of developed market central banks who are stuck in an old world order type of thinking. Sticky inflation and pricing of commodities in multiple currencies will create an FX world that trades on balance of payments & current account dynamics, resulting in less need for many countries to hold as many US$ and UST reserves as in the past. The Fed is faced with a very difficult choice: start getting serious about raising interest rates to stymie inflation and protect the $ but run the risk that they tighten us into a recession that kicks off a US govt debt crisis as tax receipts dry up or do little now to stop inflation and see the US$ continue to come under pressure anyway with potential for runaway inflation coming but ultimately improve the US competitive position to create its new domestic supply chain. We are not sure they know which way to go but they need to decide soon. The clock is ticking as Putin’s aggressions are accelerating all global time lines, rapidly moving the world to address a new world order that he has desired for decades.

World peace is a thing of the past now. Countries like Germany and Japan have announced desires to re-arm themselves. Other countries will feel similar needs to acquire resources to protect their domestic interests. And at the same time, countries are all becoming more internal, looking to protect their own citizens over trying to help others, particularly in providing basic goods. Russia has weaponized its energy resources as a way to help its domestic agenda. China has weaponized the speed of the supply chain in an effort to help its own agenda. The ball is now in the Biden Administration’s and the Fed’s court ahead of Biden’s SOTU address tonight and Powell speaking tomorrow and into the March Fed meeting in two weeks. They need to decide: Is the US govt and Fed ready to give up the hegemonic state and exorbitant privilege the US has been afforded for decades? Or will they seek to defend the $ and democracy? The next few weeks are likely to determine how things go for the next several decades. We are watching carefully.

We are long gold, gold/silver miners, agriculture commodities and bitcoin and short equity indices while the Fed remains woefully behind the curve addressing these more structural inflationary forces that are continuing to embed themselves into the public psyche.

https://3circleinvestments.substack.com/p/its-the-supply-chain-stupid?s=r

what I read-6th Oct

The US Budget deficit for 2020 is estimated at $3.3B, which is 50% of its projected expenditures. This is scary in the context of Bernholz’ observation that all major hyperinflations “have all been caused by the financing of huge public budget deficits”.(https://twitter.com/TuurDemeester)

Image

10% yield on a 2-year debt. But the principal and interest will be in the Brazilian Reals.

Image
The CEOs that went big were the ones that showed more signs of narcissistic behaviour. And while the study measured narcissism in different ways all of which had similar outcomes, one easy way to measure it is to listen to the CEOs during earnings calls (or rather, analyse the transcripts of these calls). Narcissistic CEOs use more personal pronouns that point to them like ‘I’, ‘my’, ‘mine’ than personal pronouns that point to a group or other people. The higher this ratio of first person personal pronouns to all personal pronouns is, the more likely it is that a CEO will try to engage in dumb outsized acquisitions that will lead to lower shareholder value.https://klementoninvesting.substack.com/p/hold-my-beer

I have, for a very short duration worked under this personality and I totally subscribe to the article

Chart, line chart

Description automatically generated

Signs of life in US Breakeven (inflation) yields as they finally react to surging energy prices. No reaction in gold despite the accompanying drop in real yields. https://twitter.com/Ole_S_Hansen

Image
The overall trade deficit in goods and services in US hit a new all-time worst in August of $73 billion. The trade balance in services deteriorated to a surplus of only $16.1 billion, the lowest since 2011, while imports of goods reached the worst ever $239 billion, and exports of goods edged up to a record of $150 billion, thanks to $33 billion in exports of crude oil, petroleum products, natural gas, natural gas liquids, products from the petrochemical industry, and coal. (Just Keeps Getting Worse: Services Trade Surplus, the American Dream-Not-Come-True, Worst in 10 Years. Imports Worst Ever. Trade Deficit Worst Ever | Wolf Street)

India launches contactless digital payment solution e-rupi

I am reproducing an article written in Indian express on the above subject with my comments. I think this is a step in direct direction and will help in creating ground for the launch of India’s Digital currency.

e-RUPI is a cashless and contactless digital payments medium, which will be delivered to mobile phones of beneficiaries in form of an SMS-string or a QR code.

Written by Pranav Mukul 

This will essentially be like a prepaid gift-voucher that will be redeemable at specific accepting centres without any credit or debit card, a mobile app or internet banking. (this is important distinction)

Taking the first step towards having a digital currency in the country, Prime Minister Narendra Modi will launch an electronic voucher based digital payment system “e-RUPI” Monday. The platform, which has been developed by the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI), Department of Financial Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and the National Health Authority, will be a person-specific and purpose-specific payments system.

How will e-RUPI work?

e-RUPI is a cashless and contactless digital payments medium, which will be delivered to mobile phones of beneficiaries in form of an SMS-string or a QR code. This will essentially be like a prepaid gift-voucher that will be redeemable at specific accepting centres without any credit or debit card, a mobile app or internet banking. e-RUPI will connect the sponsors of the services with the beneficiaries and service providers in a digital manner without any physical interface. ( this will ensure complete stop on leakage, be more targeted and save money for govt.

How will these vouchers be issued?

The system has been built by NPCI on its UPI platform, and has onboarded banks that will be the issuing entities. Any corporate or government agency will have to approach the partner banks, which are both private and public-sector lenders, with the details of specific persons and the purpose for which payments have to be made. The beneficiaries will be identified using their mobile number and a voucher allocated by a bank to the service provider in the name of a given person would only be delivered to that person. ( Elimination of bureaucratic govt machinery with instant implementation)

What are the use cases of e-RUPI?

According to the government, e-RUPI is expected to ensure a leak-proof delivery of welfare services. It can also be used for delivering services under schemes meant for providing drugs and nutritional support under Mother and Child welfare schemes, TB eradication programmes, drugs & diagnostics under schemes like Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana, fertiliser subsidies etc. ( think about efficieny and complete eradication of corruption).The government also said that even the private sector can leverage these digital vouchers as part of their employee welfare and corporate social responsibility programmes.

What is the significance of e-RUPI and how is it different than a digital currency?

The government is already working on developing a central bank digital currency and the launch of e-RUPI could potentially highlight the gaps in digital payments infrastructure that will be necessary for the success of the future digital currency.( this is the first step in launching digital currency and govt is using welfare schemes delivery as a guinea pig) In effect, e-RUPI is still backed by the existing Indian rupee as the underlying asset and specificity of its purpose makes it different to a virtual currency and puts it closer to a voucher-based payment system.

Also, the ubiquitousness of e-RUPI in the future will depend on the end-use cases.

What are the plans for a central bank digital currency (CBDC)?

The Reserve Bank of India had recently said that it has been working towards a phased implementation strategy for central bank digital currency or CBDC — digital currencies issued by a central bank that generally take on a digital form of the nation’s existing fiat currency such as the rupee. Speaking at a webinar on July 23, RBI deputy governor T Rabi Sankar said that CBDCs “are desirable not just for the benefits they create in payments systems, but also might be necessary to protect the general public in an environment of volatile private VCs. While in the past, RBI governor Shaktikanta Das had flagged concerns over cryptocurrencies, there seems to be a change of mood now in favour of CBDCs on Mint Street. Although CBDCs are conceptually similar to currency notes, the introduction of CBDC would involve changes to the enabling legal framework since the current provisions are primarily synced for currency in paper form.

Does India have appetite for a digital currency?

According to the RBI, there are at least four reasons why digital currencies are expected to do well in India: One, there is increasing penetration of digital payments in the country that exists alongside sustained interest in cash usage, especially for small value transactions. Two, India’s high currency to GDP ratio, according to the RBI, “holds out another benefit of CBDCs”. ( elimination of black money is the agenda here) Three, the spread of private virtual currencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum may be yet another reason why CBDCs become important from the point of view of the central bank. As Christine Lagarde, President of the ECB has mentioned in the BIS Annual Report “… central banks have a duty to safeguard people’s trust in our money. Central banks must complement their domestic efforts with close cooperation to guide the exploration of central bank digital currencies to identify reliable principles and encourage innovation.” Four, CBDCs might also cushion the general public in an environment of volatile private VCs.

Are there global examples of a voucher-based welfare system?

In the US, there is the system of education vouchers or school vouchers, which is a certificate of government funding for students selected for state-funded education to create a targeted delivery system. These are essentially subsidies given directly to parents of students for the specific purpose of educating their children. In addition to the US, the school voucher system has been used in several other countries such as Colombia, Chile, Sweden, Hong Kong, etc.

Explained: What is e-RUPI and how does it work? | Explained News,The Indian Express

The End of Age of Speculation- Bill Blain

via Morning Porridge

“Speculation may be indulged when based on facts..”

This Morning: Markets are full of noise about everything from inflation, risk, leverage and politics, but the reality is we are approaching “Peak Speculation”. It doesn’t mean a crash is imminent, but that investment strategies and approaches are going to have to factor in a new reality, and be far more suspicious, questioning and smart as a new reality takes hold. The consequences of QE and other factors that fuelled the speculative age could be with us for decades.

Forgive me if this morning’s comment is disconnected, but I’m still catching up and trying to get to grips with what turned out to be the worst week for markets, oh, since the last worst week for markets, (back in Feb). There are just so many data-points, multiplicities of opinions, bear-traps, rumours and sighs, to consider…

What do they collectively mean?

Let’s start with the view from up high. I reckon we’re approaching the top of a particular phase in a very long-term distortion cycle that began back in the ruin of the Global Financial Crisis (“GFC”) in 2008. Let’s call the current stage the “Speculation Phase”. The dominant factor on markets these past 12 years has been increasingly speculative behaviour, fuelled by rabid financial asset inflation and crashing yields as monetary experimentation in the wake of the GFC kicked in.

I must calculate exactly how much money the Big Four Central Banks and the rest have pumped into markets through bank bailouts, easy short-term money like TLTROs, and quantitative easing since 2008. It’s a lot. It has not been matched by a commensurate rise in the stock of real assets like infrastructure, factories and offices… Nope. All that money has gone somewhere… the only thing that has risen is the price of financial assets: equity prices soared and bond yields crashed. Companies are worth far more today than in 2008, but their actual tangible footprint in terms of jobs and presence hasn’t changed that much.

If the purpose of QE was to kick start economies, then it’s D- report cards for Central Banks. The post GFC global recovery over the last decade has been pretty anaemic – with the exception of China. All that’s happened is companies are worth more, meaning their owners are wealthier – on the back of financial asset inflation.

QE policies have had a devastating distorting effect on markets and investment. The consequences are still barely understood across social and commercial behaviours. For instance, corporates have been incentivised to buy back stock (to reward executives), savings have been gutted, the wealthy have thrived, while austerity to pay for QE has driven declines in living standards and expectations for the vast majority of workers.

Central bank money and keeping rates artificially low has resulted in a scramble for yields of any kind – which is why every investor is exposed to greater risks. Government bond investors have dug down into junk corporate debt in search of returns, while equity investors have increasingly bought into increasingly improbable new tech disruptive visions. This is why it’s the Speculative Phase – investors increasingly betting on imagined possibilities, dreams, visions and claims, rather than fundamental analysis and future income streams.

Speculation has fuelled the SPAC craze – betting smart entrepreneurs can identify not so much the next money-making machine, but the next stock the market will pile into. It becomes self-fulfilling. What do the current spate of lacklustre IPOs, a multitude of SPACs scrabbling to find acquisition targets really mean? (Clue: desperation to get it done before it’s too late.)

The Speculation Phase finds its ultimate expression in the invention of a completely new and invisible asset class that only very clever people can understand. If you haven’t read the Emperor’s New Clothes – then I suggest you do. My Coinbase account was up 50% at one point last week…. I have no idea why… When the only basis for investing in an entirely new but “serious” asset class is the expectation the price will rise, thus allowing its sale to a “greater fool” – the whole basis of Dogecoin et al… well it’s a Casino and you got lucky.

We’ve been approaching the top of the Speculative Phase for some time… all that noise in 2020 about switching out of tech stocks that promise much but fail to deliver profits, into dull, boring and predictable stocks that produce steady dividend streams and trade at realistic price/earnings. It’s happening. This is the year when we are likely to find out how many tech evangelists are swimming sans bikini bottoms.

The trick for markets is spotting how this Speculative Phase peaks.

It doesn’t necessarily mean a market crash is imminent, but that investors and traders are going to have to play a very different game – identifying real value versus the stocks fuelled by the speculative hype. They do exist – in fundamentals, in tech, in alternatives and even in bonds.

As always, uncertainty colours everything. We just don’t know how much longer the QE-fuelled financial asset binge is going to last; as inflation (short or long-term) kicks in, and long-term concerns on wealth, inequality, and environment become increasingly dominant – how will central banks and governments change direction?

The big issue is clearly the resurgent inflationary threat – is it real or not? I suspect that it rather depends on the market itself. If the market believes the inflation threat is real it will react accordingly. The latest data from the USA suggests inflationary expectations are rising among traders and consumers. (Last week, we scrambled to put in orders for materials for our redeveloped house after getting the heads-up Glass and Flooring prices will rise up to 40% this month!)

Meanwhile, the money faucet continues to pour. Since 2020 and the start of the COVID pandemic we’d seen an extraordinary shift from the Government from utter reliance on Central Banking QE to keep interest rates low and markets happy. Governments are now splurging as much in terms of fiscal carpet bombing of the global economy with cash as central banks did. How much of it will actually find its way into real economic activity, and how much will simply fuel a new outbreak of speculative market frenzy? 

The noise about declining confidence in fiat currencies feeds libertarian thinking which fuels cryptos – which looks much like a frying pan into fire trade.

That’s why the current noise in markets is so important to follow. At the moment we’ve got a whole host of factors to watch:

US Inflation Numbers, tennis-ball bounce back recovery expectations, threats of renewed coronavirus lockdowns in Asia, a nascent commodities super-cycle, supply chain blockages, labour market inefficiencies, the retreat of retail investors, continuing minimal yields across asset classes, the rise of decentralised finance and cryptocurrencies, a tick-back in tech stocks, the less than astounding performance of recent IPOs and SPACs, rising political tensions, cyber attacks, Central Banks hedging themselves…. Etc, etc…

Serious money investors are nervous about volumes, leverage and liquidity. They are all aware of just how much distortion is out there. Understanding the risks for markets driven largely by FOMO (fear of missing out) is critical. Most folk think timing is a matter of luck, but the chartists are all out there talking about big shunts coming as delusional markets turn into traps.

It’s going to be fascinating to watch how UK restaurants fare as they reopen from today. Many are struggling to find workers – who have either left the UK because of Brexit or found better paid jobs during lockdown. There is an awful lot being written about the unwillingness of workers to return to low paying jobs as the economy reopens. The Right say it’s a demonstration of the evils of state handouts discouraging honest work. The Left believe it highlights how low-wages in mac-jobs is a form of wage-slavery. There is an element of truth in both. If jobs aren’t rewarding – both financially and in terms of satisfaction, then why would you not do something else?

Markets should be paying more attention to behavioural science – just how much Covid, and the increasing divides in wealth inequality, are changing the expectations and objectives of global consumers. These will change global commerce long-term. As an example, Starling Bank recently released research claiming 56% of 26-40 year olds (the Millennials) have refocused on their “life goals” like saving for a house versus avocado toast for breakfast.

Sell Avocados and expensive coffee shops?

Most important Chart in the world

The most important chart to watch right now is the US 10yr Yield

rising bond yields will put pressure on “Long Bond proxy” .. the Tech sector and could accelerate the move into Value and Emerging Markets

( chart courtesy allstar charts)

But who is most exposed to rising rates?

No it is not US households, neither it is US corporations but it is US govt

As Luke Gromen writes in FFTT

Fed is trapped and they cannot allow free markets to function because rising rates

Ignoring energy Transition realities

I read a piece by Goehring & Rozencwajg you may also access the commentary here on supply demand mismatches commodities in general and specifically on some of my favorite topics like OIL, AGRI, URANIUM, COPPER, GOLD

Main Points

On Alternate Energy

Vaclav Smil, Distinguished Professor Emeritus in the Faculty of Environment at the University of Manitoba, is the best energy scholar we have ever read, in our opinion. In his Energy Transitions, he notes that historically a new energy source takes between 40–60 years to gain significant market share. The current proposals assume wind and solar will make comparable gains in only 20 years. Ambitious plans often carry ambitious budgets, and the green energy transition is no exception. Using extremely aggressive cost saving assumptions, a widespread move to renewable power is expected to cost $70 tr over 20 years, nearly $50 tr more than if we stayed on the current trajectory. Unfortunately, our research tells us this additional spending will not even come close to generating the expected reduction in global carbon.

Electric vehicles will likely not deliver the necessary carbon reduction either. In Norway, electric vehicle sales have gone from zero to nearly 60% penetration between 2010 and 2019. Despite such a dramatic shift away from oil, Norway’s carbon intensity has declined by 10% compared with 11% in the US where EVs remain less than 2% of all vehicle sales.

Wind and solar are extremely inefficient generators of electricity due to their low energy density and their intermittency. In the coming weeks, we will release a podcast that goes into much greater detail about these shortcomings. In summary, a solar panel likely only dispatches between 12 and 20% of its rated capacity due to the intermittency of sunshine. A wind turbine is somewhat better, but still less than 25%. As a result, excess capacity must be built to generate the necessary electricity. Moreover, the power must be “buffered” by a storage system to smooth out the inherent variability coming from both short-term dislocations (clouds and periods of calm), as well as different patterns between day and night.

On Oil

Regarding demand, we believe 2021 will see a huge rebound. Although the financial press has made little comment, oil consumption in China, India, and now Brazil has made new highs. If our models of emerging market oil demand are correct, 2021 will see global oil demand surpass its pre-COVID highs as the successful roll-out of vaccines gets underway. As we progress through the year, we expect a structural gap between supply and demand will emerge, eventually approaching nearly three million barrels per day, even once all OPEC+ curtailed oil is brought back onto the market. Given that oil prices should recover strongly in 2021 and that oil-related investments remain undervalued, we recommend maximum exposure in this space.

On Copper

China today is pushing to become a leader in generating electricity from renewable sources, an extremely copper intensive exercise. This alone could add several hundred thousand tonnes of incremental copper consumption annually. Also, China, has announced huge investments in their data center and cloud computing industries, both extremely copper and power intensive

On Precious Metals

We continue to believe this gold bull market will be driven by Western investors, as opposed to the 1999–2011 gold bull market, which was driven almost entirely by investors from India and China. The recent slacking of Western demand, as measured by the physical ETFs we follow, gives us more evidence that a potential lengthy period of sideways price action in both gold and silver prices is now taking place.

On Uranium

Despite the bullish outlook (and the Q4 rally), 2020 in many ways, was a frustrating year for uranium investors. Spot prices were strong between January and May, rallying from $24 to $34 per pound before retracing half the advance to end the year at $30.20 per pound on much lower volumes. Term prices rallied from $32 to $36 per pound between December and January and have been stable since on extremely depressed contracted volumes. Concerns over COVID related demand forced many term fuel buyers to the sidelines. US utilities are only 2% uncovered in 2021, but this level jumps to 35% by 2025, suggesting fuel buyers are vulnerable to any rise in price. With the recent speculation of delayed US reactor retirements, we believe we may see fuel buyers finally reenter the term contract market sometime in 2021.

Turning to supply and demand, trends exhibited in 2020 continue to be very bullish. Since nuclear reactors represent baseload capacity—much more so than natural gas plants—and rely on multi-year fueling programs, global demand was less impacted by COVID-19 than other areas in global energy markets. We estimate that global demand was only off 1%—or 1.2-mm pounds. Mine supply on the other hand was greatly impacted by curtailed production at Kazatomprom and the suspension of operations at Cameco’s flagship Cigar Lake due to COVID cases among employees. In total, global mine supply was down 20 mm pounds or 14%. After restarting in September, production at Cigar Lake was yet again suspended in December and remains shut as of today, implying continued tightness into the first months of 2021. Global uranium inventories likely drew in excess of 30 mm pounds in 2020 and we anticipate further draws this year as well.

The coming global agriculture crisis

Over the last four years, global agriculture has sat on a knife’s edge. Extremely strong grain demand, sourced from the developing world, has been met with extremely favorable global growing conditions resulting in bumper crops. Because of favorable weather, global grain markets have been able to accommodate strong demand with little in the way of upside price pressure. However, we believe this is now changing.

”Grain inventories have now been drawn down to levels that could easily slip into dangerous zones if weather in the 2021 northern hemispheric growing season becomes even slightly problematic, which we believe it may. The first signs of drought conditions have already emerged in Brazil, the wheat growing region of the Former Soviet Union, and in the US Midwest. Northeast China’s wheat growing region is currently suffering extremely cold weather causing severe damage to their winter wheat crop.

Goldman Sachs’ Currie predicts ‘long-lasting bull market’ for virtually all commodities

Oil demand 102.5 million b/d in 2022, prices at $65/b end-2021

Energy transition to stimulate oil demand, EVs facing lithium shortfall

US stimulus to kick-start policy boost for demand globally

London — The world is entering a “long-lasting bull market” for commodities, with even oil set to benefit as recent underinvestment, dollar weakness, government spending and the energy transition boost demand across the board, Goldman Sachs’ global head of commodities research, Jeffrey Currie, said Dec. 8.

Speaking at an FT Live event, Currie said “every single commodity market with the exception of wheat is in a deficit today” and highlighted the example of oil, saying capital expenditure in the oil sector had fallen an unprecedented 40% in the first half of the year. He argued that even oil demand would be boosted by spending on the energy transition, due to the volume of oil consumed in the course of green energy infrastructure projects.

Goldman Sachs has a “target” price for oil of $65/b for the end of 2021 and is forecasting rapid demand recovery, with global demand set to reach 102.5 million b/d in 2022, he said, up from the International Energy Agency’s estimate that oil demand in 2019 was at 100.1 million b/d.

“It’s important to separate the vaccine, which is a tactical upside catalyst, from the pandemic itself, which is a structural catalyst to a longer-lasting bull market. As we look out to 2021 the vaccine creates that V-shaped recovery… but looking beyond that we believe it’s the beginning of a structural bull market not only in oil, but across the entire commodity complex,” Currie said.

Despite a reduction in oil demand for business travel, “we think the market’s going to be in substantial deficit throughout the end of next year and beyond into 2022… You have structural under-investment in supply — we call it the revenge of the old economy. It’s not just oil, it’s metals, mining, the entire old economy has shortages in investment,” he said.

“The second theme, policy, sits at the center of the demand story. The big catalyst that the pandemic shifted is that policy after 2008-9 was directed at market stability: whether it was OPEC, the [US Federal Reserve,] the Chinese five-year plan, everything was around financial stability. Now, all the policy is around social need, and social need creates a redistribution of wealth towards lower-income, income-constrained households that consume a lot more… Demand is relatively strong across the board.”

“We call it revving commodity demand — redistributional policies, environmental policies… and then there’s the versatility in supply chains” in the form of stockpiling of commodities by countries such as China, he said.

“Policy-driven demand is going to create a capex cycle that is bigger than the BRICS in the 2000s, not quite as big as the ’70s, but we’re talking about that kind of a bull market in commodities,” Currie said.

“It’s the same three legs everywhere — redistribution, Green, and then something to deal with the resilience of supply chains — all [governments] are focused on that, whether it’s the US, Europe or China,” he said, arguing the policy side of the new cycle would be kick-started by a potential $500 million stimulus likely to be approved by the US Congress in the coming days.

Currie went on to argue that a weakening US dollar was also providing “tailwinds” for the commodity sector, with the effect already evident in price rises in oil and commodities such as copper and iron ore, with iron ore prices hitting seven-year highs on Dec. 7. “This is not something we’re forecasting for the future — we’re inside it right now,” he said.

On the topic of energy transition, Currie played down some of the more optimistic forecasts by his fellow panelists on the pace of progress in battery technology, and the rise of electric vehicles, highlighting among other factors limitations in lithium availability.

“Right now Tesla and Apple consume 50% of the world’s lithium market. These metals markets cannot accommodate scaling up these battery technologies at the rates that are potentially anticipated here,” Currie said, going on to voice skepticism about the pace of improvement in battery technology.

https://www.spglobal.com/platts/en/market-insights/videos/market-movers-americas/120720-opec-extension-bullish-crude

Some of the Buffers Against Inflation Are Weakening or Disappearing

The following are some of the factors that may, over the next year or so, begin to spark a renewed pickup in prices. 

(1) In the 00s, there were sizable upsurges in global commodity prices as China, the source of nearly half the world’s demand for raw materials, embarked on several massive infrastructure spending programs. Since then, there’s been more than a decade of disappointing world trade. 

Beijing has recently announced a new expenditure kick start to its economy, to usher in more high-tech development, especially in 5G networking, and to counter the negative impacts of the coronavirus downturn that paralyzed growth at the end of last year. Commodities (copper, nickel, iron ore, aluminum, steel, cement, etc.) are the building blocks of nearly everything. If they move up in price to a significant degree, watch out for a ‘snowball effect.’

(2) To expand further on the previous point, this summer saw softwood lumber prices nearly double as an unexpected demand swell smashed into a supply shortage caused by sawmill closures. The shutdowns were in anticipation of a house-building collapse that failed to happen. (In fact, the opposite occurred.) Lately, there’s been a better balancing of demand and supply, and ‘all dimensions’ lumber has eased in cost. But there’s a similar situation in energy pricing. From an inflation standpoint, the world has received a break from global oil and liquefied natural gas prices that have been much lower than historically. How long can this situation prevail?

(3) On the labor side of costs, the balance of power in contract negotiations has resided with management since the serious onset of globalization. For years, many disgruntled workers have been biting their tongues, knowing that if they become viewed as a nuisance, they run the risk of being replaced by someone overseas. To the extent that ‘deglobalization’ takes hold and reverses what has gone before, it will return more leverage and bargaining strength to labor.

(4) Further on the cost of labor, President-elect Biden has made no secret of his desire that the concerns of U.S. labor receive a priority boost. Minimum wage hikes are now more likely. A ‘Buy America’ initiative will be launched to put more Americans back to work. The merits of such courses of action can be easily argued, but everyone should know that they’ll be paying a bit more consequently.

(5) High-tech has not received enough credit for keeping prices in check over the past decade-plus. Advances in software and hardware development, often tied to big data, have sent prices plunging in communications, manufacturing (think automation) and the services sector (one can order almost anything online). There may seem to be no limits to how much more can be achieved, but perhaps that’s a fallacy. For example, Uber and Lyft have cut the cost of a taxi ride, but can there be a next-phase reduction?

(6) Record low mortgage rates are driving a significant increase in demand for residential real estate and both new and existing home prices. The National Association of Realtors (NAR), the National Association of Homebuilders (NAHB), and the Canadian Real Estate Association (CREA) all have home price indices that are presently rising by double-digit percentage increases. Will the run-up in prices on the homes front spill over into other marketplaces?

(7) Another key factor spurring on new and existing homes purchases has been the doubling in the ‘savings’ rate. With greatly reduced opportunities to spend money on theater tickets, dining out, trips around the country, and so on, many wage earners are fattening up their bank accounts. Some of those funds are going towards property down payments. A portion, though, is being held in reserve, awaiting widespread vaccine distribution to bring the coronavirus under control. When immunity occurs, a wave of savings will be unleashed, with the potential to chase after and stampede the prices of goods and service.  

https://www.constructconnect.com/blog/no-reason-to-fear-inflation-8-hypotheses-argue-otherwise