Mihir Sharma on The Billionaire Raj

Mihir Sharma writes when reviewing The Billionaire Raj “Democracy is under threat, whether in India or elsewhere, not from the oligarchs but from those who promise to control them. You don’t even need your oligarchs to hold enormous political power to create the appearance of a grave threat that needs to be corralled – if your propaganda machinery is good enough. We in India are threatened with the worst of both worlds. The rich will retain control of our markets and our resources, but they will be those who have come to an accommodation with the populists in power. Meanwhile, a supposed anti-corruption campaign will keep growth from hitting the heights that it has in the past, thereby keeping millions in poverty. This combination is not unique to India, either; more and more emerging markets are falling victim to the same disease. If this is a progressive era, then India, I fear, is destined to go backwards”

Read More

https://www.australianforeignaffairs.com/news/afa4-book-review-by-mihir-sharma

Vangaurd CIO on Return expectations, Interest Rates and Blockchain

In the following interview, Vanguard Chief Investment Officer Greg Davis addresses investment and economic conditions, investor expectations, and some of the ways technology is improving financial market efficiency and transparency.
The bull market in stocks that began in many parts of the world in early 2009 is nearly a decade old. Should investors adjust their expectations?
Based on our fair-valuation metrics, we expect globally diversified stock portfolios to deliver annualized returns in the 4.5%–6.5% range over the next ten years.1 That’s roughly half of their long-term historical average return. And it’s roughly a third of their annualized gains since the depths of the financial crisis a decade ago. So, yes, some investors probably are expecting too much from stocks.
Below our headline expectations for global stock portfolios, which assume dollar-denominated investments, are somewhat higher forecasts for non-U.S. markets and somewhat lower forecasts for the U.S. market. We’re a little more optimistic about stocks outside the U.S. because their valuations are lower.
The U.S. Federal Reserve, the nation’s central bank, has raised its target for short-term interest rates eight times in the last three years. What’s changed in the U.S. fixed income markets as the Fed has worked to normalize monetary policy?
Longer-term bond yields began to rise in the middle of 2016, about six months after the Fed started its current cycle of rate hikes. But the curve has flattened a lot since then, as longer-term yields have climbed less than shorter-term yields. We believe one reason the increases in longer-term yields have been relatively muted is investor skepticism that the rate of U.S. inflation is going to spend much time above the Fed’s 2% target. One thing that rising yields, particularly short-term yields, have done is to make cash and U.S. Treasuries more compelling investments—a real competing force relative to equities in certain cases.
How many more Federal Reserve rate hikes are likely?
We’re expecting one more rate hike this year, when the Fed meets on December 18–19. It’s almost certain to be another quarter-percentage-point increase, as all of the Fed’s moves in the current cycle have been. If so, the target rate would rise from a range of 2.00%–2.25% to 2.25%–2.50%. We expect two more increases next year. By the time we get to the second half of 2019, we’re likely to be in neutral policy territory, with a target rate of 2.75%–3.00%.
Central bankers in other countries are only beginning to lift their target interest rates from global financial crisis lows. How do you expect them to proceed?
We expect the European Central Bank to leave rates alone until the fall of 2019, at which point it will begin to gradually normalize policy. The Bank of Japan seems unlikely to raise rates in 2019. Many of the emerging markets banks will be forced to tighten along with the Fed, although China is skirting the trend through further capital controls and modest yuan depreciation.
Your Fixed Income Group manages more than $1.2 trillion in bond and money market assets. What portfolio-construction approach is the team emphasizing?
When we think about our active fixed income portfolios, we’ve been trying to be a bit more defensive. Valuations for U.S. investment-grade and high-yield bonds aren’t as attractive as they have been over the last ten years. There’s been a lot of spread compression—the differences between yields of lower-risk and higher-risk securities are not as large as they have been.Given the late phase of the economic cycle and the risk of more restrictive Fed policy, U.S. investment-grade and high-yield bonds could be negatively affected by rising corporate borrowing costs. So could emerging markets bonds, since many are issued in U.S.-dollar denominations or from countries with currencies pegged to the dollar. Of course, this doesn’t mean investors should necessarily avoid these segments. We believe diversification is crucial to long-term investing success. I like a quote from investment researcher Peter Bernstein, who said that if you’re not invested in something that makes you uncomfortable, you’re not really diversified.
You mentioned expected stock returns over the coming decade. How are global bond markets apt to perform?
In his 2019 economic and market outlook, Vanguard Global Chief Economist Joe Davis forecasted annualized global fixed income returns in the 2.2%–4.2% range in U.S. dollar terms, driven mostly by rising central bank policy rates and higher yields. Our estimates are notably higher than they were a year ago, when we anticipated 1.5%–3.5% returns. However, they remain muted compared to a long-term historical return of 4.7%.
If our new forecast proves accurate, globally diversified bond investors in many parts of the world should, over time, earn real returns—that is, returns above the rate of inflation. This assumes that central banks succeed in keeping inflation in the range of 2%, which is more or less the goal in the U.S., Canada, Australia, Japan, the U.K., and the euro area.
There have been some recent signs of modestly slower economic growth around the world. How might slower growth affect the financial markets?
The market effects of an economic slowdown, whenever the next one occurs, probably will depend on two factors—the speed and depth of the slowdown and the extent to which investors accurately anticipate those changes. Our Investment Strategy Group recently completed some interesting research on economic surprises and the returns of various asset classes. It found some correlation in the short term; the connection varied with the phase of the economic cycle. In the long term, on the other hand, it found that economic surprises don’t really matter.2
What are the chances of a U.S. recession in the next year or two?
We don’t see a U.S. recession as our base case, but we believe the possibility has risen as the yield curve has flattened. At this point, the probability might be 20%–30% in 2019. Looking at 2020, the risk might rise to 30%–40%. The primary drivers of rising recession risk are higher interest rates and concerns about slowing global growth. Our estimates reflect a pair of models: a single-factor model based on the slope of the yield curve, and a multifactor model that incorporates other leading indicators as well, such as credit spreads, stock market returns, and economic growth signals. The yield curve is sometimes dismissed as a recession warning signal, but our research suggests that it should not be ignored.3
The growth of indexing has been grabbing attention lately, with some speculating that its rise will lead to the next stock market downturn. Do you think there’s any there, there?
I don’t know what will cause the next market correction, but it won’t be indexing. I’m confident about that for several reasons. First, there’s been no historical correlation between indexing and market downturns. The percentage of fund assets in index funds has grown steadily, while the market has fluctuated more or less randomly. Second, index mutual funds and ETFs, which mostly follow index strategies, are a small part of the overall markets. Among U.S. stocks—easily the most heavily indexed asset class—index fund management accounts for less than 5% of the daily exchange-traded volume. And almost all of the trading in ETFs simply transfers ETF share ownership from one investor to another. Only about 10% of ETF trades cause buying and selling in the underlying securities that make up the funds. Finally, while some claim that index fund investors will rush to sell in the next downturn, exacerbating it, the opposite happened in 2000–2002 and 2008–2009. Investors sought out index funds, adding significantly to their holdings. It’s not clear to me why the next downturn would see them behave much differently.
What do you think about crypto currencies like bitcoin?
We’re not fans of bitcoin and see it as a speculative bubble. We are very interested in blockchain, the technology that underlies the electronic currency, and what it can do to increase our efficiency and that of the financial markets. For example, we’ve partnered with benchmark provider CRSP and Symbiont, a blockchain firm, to automate intraday index data transmission through a blockchain network. That will increase transparency and decrease the risk of disruptions sometimes caused by manual processes. In turn, this will make capital markets cheaper, faster, and more accurate for investors.
You’ve been Vanguard’s CIO for about 18 months. If there were only one message you could share with clients and prospective clients, what would it be?
That we’re more than an indexing and low-cost leader. We’ve historically delivered outperforming actively managed funds as well. During the ten years ended September 30, 2018, for example, 92% of our U.S.-domiciled actively managed funds topped the average returns of competing funds.4 We’re also determined to help investors everywhere—whether they’re investing for themselves, their families, or institutions, directly or through financial advisors or consultants—make the best possible decisions. That’s why we’ve invested heavily in our ability to provide financial advice. Our ability to do much more than index and deliver low costs is a natural outgrowth of our corporate stability and our client focus. Ultimately it reflects our mission—to take a stand for all investors, to treat them fairly, and to give them the best chance for investment success. We’re serious about it.
1 Ten-year period is 2019–2028. See: Vanguard economic and market outlook for 2019.https://advisors.vanguard.com/VGApp/iip/site/advisor/researchcommentary/article/IWE_InvResGlblOtlkDnBtNtOt

EQUITY market needs LIQUIDITY

Nedbank strategist Mehul and Neels writes some exciting stuff and like me, they don’t confuse Fundamentals with LIQUIDITY. They write in a strategy note

There is a strong relationship between the change in Global $-Liquidity (M1) and the performance of the global stock market.(76% correlation)

• Global $-Liquidity leads the global stock market by an average of eight months.

• If there is no boost to Global $-Liquidity, we expect this relationship to hold. As a result, the risk of further downside potential for stock markets across the world would remain intact.

 

Further..The EMBI(USD-denominated corporate debt) spread is very close to a breakout level.
• We believe this is the “canary in a coal mine” for risk assets.
• USD-denominated debt of EMcorporates has grown from USD650bn in 2009 to the current USD3.2tn and there significant mismatches i.e. USD-denominated debt as a percentage of GDP is 70% and as a percentage of reserves is 75%.
• Amid a slowdown in global growth, coupled with a tighter Global $-Liquidity environment, if EM$-corporate spreads continue to widen, it would negate our view below on EM equities, i.e., that a short-term bounce is possible.

My two cents
So it comes down to LIQUIDITY and the global money supply is not expanding, infact it is contracting. FED is already in QT mode ( forget rate increase, that’s only the cost of providing LIQUIDITY) and  In a widely expected decision ECB has also decided to stop its QE so how will the existing debt be serviced and how will the new debt be created if Private sector and consumer is already leveraged?

Deutsche Bank, Lack of confidence and why Germany is paying 0.25% for its 10 year bond

Martin Armstrong writes in his blog “Deutsche Bank is in crisis and everyone has known that. Its derivative book is hard to quantify what is the real net bottom line. The only bank it could have been merged with was BNP but that was French and they cannot allow cross-border capital flows in bailouts. That left Commerce Bank, but they too have a lot of the same problems.
The two will be merged WITH government assistance covered up. As I have warned, Deutsche Bank is the biggest bank in Europe. I failed to see how Germany could allow it to collapse, Hence, this merger has to be accomplished with government aid – the very thing they tell Italy they cannot do. – Merkel had to blink.

(No the following chart is not of bitcoin…. it is of deutsche bank)

(Comparison of DB and Lehman brothers)

Inspite of an expectation of such big bailout…The falling yields on German government debt is simply intensifying the trade to buy German and short everything in the South in anticipation of a failed Euro. It really a stretch to claim yields are declining in Germany because the expect lower rates at the Fed. This is purely a speculative punter’s play – not a shift in strategic portfolios. Italy’s budget battle with Brussels remains a concern as is the case with BREXIT. There is just a growing lack of confidence in Europe (this is the only reason they are paying such low yields… there is capital flight from rest of Europe into Germany) .I do not believe that any fundamental pattern implies such a shift at the Federal Reserve as the reason for capital movement within the Eurozone market.”

Blockchain Technology – The Biggest Wealth Creation Opportunity of our Lifetime

I know nobody wants to listen about Blockchain anymore, but the contrarian in me decided to understand more about this technology.

Below is the transcript on the Blockchain technology in an interesting discussion with Mark Yusco

Some interesting comments which caught my eye

I think this is the most critical point that investors need to think about. I think that all great networks in the future will run on blockchains, and Bitcoin is one of the first great networks. And what people forget is that 5 of the 10 largest companies today aren’t simply companies in the traditional hierarchical sense, they are networks. The value of a network rises in a different way than a traditional company, they grow in an exponential way, because of Metcalfe’s law and networks function in unique ways relative to traditional assets, derive their value from different elements and, therefore, must be valued differently.

One of the challenges to institutional adoption is that most of the people in crypto today are what some refer to as the “crypto kids”, young people who have experience in tech, but very little (if any) experience in the traditional investment business. They look across the river at the stodgy institutional people and they don’t want to work with them because they are too different from themselves. And the institutional people who have all the money are looking back at the kids wearing black t-shirts and saying they don’t want to work with them either. Stalemate.

I think that eventually there will be an intersection of these communities and I think it will be big. It reminds me perfectly of the first time I introduced the idea of investing in hedge funds to the board of Notre Dame back in the early ‘90s. They said “absolutely not’ because that was where all the “bad people” were. Morgan Creek, and other companies, helped people get comfortable with the notion that you have to follow the talent, even when the talent is migrating to a space, that’s not exactly where you want to go. I’ve only seen this once before in my career, and that was in the early ‘90s when tons of really smart people left great jobs in great industries and flooded into the Internet, and it literally changed the world. I believe the Blockchain evolution might be even bigger

Mark view on markets

The bottom line is that I think we will have a slowdown in 2019 and markets might roll over pretty hard.

I think bonds and stocks will struggle, and I think it’s a time to explore alternatives. My focus lately has been real assets, like gold and commodities. They are the cheapest they have ever been versus paper. In the game rock, paper, scissors, paper always beats rock. However, I think that in this new abnormal world, as a result of the debt super cycle, rock will beat paper. Real assets will crush paper assets over the next decade. And I think crypto will be somewhere in the middle.

https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fincrementum.us11.list-manage.com%2Ftrack%2Fclick%3Fu%3Db268a38a165b03979d95268dd%26id%3D78aab30c17%26e%3D1ac26fcb31&data=02%7C01%7C%7C8f015968350642a0497508d6601c892e%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636802073035239978&sdata=goUwJkGTcEy%2BVa6VqIt0H4oAf89weiUTIZzHXiiXNLg%3D&reserved=0

Charts That Matter

India

The season for good data. CPI inflation slows to 2.3% (expectation 2.6%) a 17 months low,prompting economists to expect rate cut early next year IIP accelerates to 8.1% ( expectation of 5.6%) an 11 months high.

China

China M1 growth is 32bps away from all-time lows yet its economy remains solely dependent on QE & new credit to expand.If over half of global GDP growth for the last decade relied on China, what is this telling you about the current macro environment?

The Chinese Debt Bubble … only a command economy can do it

US

Downward Dollar
Strategists in the $5.1 trillion-a-day currency market are gearing up for a slumping dollar next year, while pinning their hopes for 2019 gains on the yen. I don’t agree and my view is 2019 will be the one of the best year for Greenback.

Turkey

The power of depreciation!Turkey records its biggest current-account surplus on record!.Erdogan is destroying the purchasing power of the currency and drives 21.3% inflation which is really good for… no one in Turkey.

I’ve Been High

Eric Cinnamond writes “In order to achieve attractive absolute returns over a full market cycle, it’s very important to avoid permanent losses to capital. Based on my experience, an effective way to limit large mistakes is to generate accurate asset valuations.
A common error made in business valuation is related to extrapolation, or assuming current operating conditions will persist far into the future. Instead of extrapolating and thinking of a company’s profit cycle as linear, I believe most business results are cyclical, with profit margins gravitating towards their mean.
To take the cyclical nature of business into consideration, I typically use a normalized cash flow assumption in my discounted cash flow model. In effect, I want to avoid being too optimistic during the peaks and too pessimistic during the troughs. In my opinion, a normalized cash flow assumption provides investors with a more accurate valuation than extrapolating current trends far into the future.

Similar to businesses, I view the economy and stock market through a cyclical lens. As is the case with many things in life, there are natural highs and lows. Despite the natural cyclical tendencies of the market and economy, a significant amount of effort and capital has been allocated towards maintaining the current cycle’s high.
In my opinion, the desire to maintain this cycle’s high originates from the 1999 stock market bubble. The high created from that cycle’s asset inflation was exhilarating. Record equity prices contributed to strong economic growth, rising wages, and a fiscal surplus. Unless you were a short seller or disciplined value investor, it was very easy to make money. All you needed was a brokerage account and a cash advance from your credit card!
Things were so good in 1999, some economists, including Alan Greenspan, were concerned the United States would eventually pay off its debt (concerned because the Treasury market would disappear)! It was truly an amazing and prosperous period few had ever seen – so unique, it was labeled the “New Economy”. Unfortunately for many, the boom couldn’t be maintained, the bubble popped, and reversion defeated extrapolation.
Ever since the 1999-2000 bubble peak, it appears to me that we, as a society, have been trying to relive that high. Policy makers in particular have increased their focus on the wealth effect and financial stability. Once used mainly as an economic indicator, the financial markets have become the go-to lever to pull when the economy needs a boost. Reflating asset prices has become synonymous with reflating the economy. If a stock market bubble pops, replace it with a housing bubble. If a housing bubble pops, cut rates to 0%, buy trillions of assets (global QE), and watch everything fly.

He concludes
In my opinion, the tremendous amount of effort and resources used to sustain the current cycle stems from the desire of investors, corporations, and policy makers to live their lives on high. Unfortunately, as nice as it would be for profits and asset prices to remain near peak levels indefinitely, it’s not how the markets, or life for that matter, typically works. Eventually “the light washes over” and the cyclical nature of business, markets, and the economy is revealed.

http://www.ericcinnamond.com/ive-been-high/

Modi seen forgiving farm loans as he seeks to win back rural voters

Reuters write “Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government is likely to announce loan waivers worth billions of dollars to woo millions of farmers ahead of a general election, government sources said, after his ruling party suffered a rural drubbing in state polls”.
To claw back support among India’s 263 million farmers and their many millions of dependents, Modi’s administration would soon start working out the details of a plan allocating money to write off farm loans, government sources said.
With a national election due by May 2019, Modi and the BJP have run out of time to announce other easy, popular measures such as raising the support, or guaranteed, prices for staples such as rice and wheat, farm analysts said.
“Elections are round the corner and you know that you’ve failed to fix the problems being faced by these farmers, so you will soon go to town promising agri-loan waivers,” said Ashok Gulati, a farm economist who advised India’s last government on crop prices.
The plan could see as much as 4 trillion rupees ($56.5 billion) in loans written off, the government sources and analysts said.

My two cents

I was hoping  against hope that we will not see any more dole out of the free money but with a pliant RBI governor and soft CPI government might just succeed in reflating the economy and postpone this problem to be dealt after the general election.

Contrary to popular perceptions, populism is very bullish in early stages because it liquifies the system. Fiscal policy taking over to offset monetary drag. At some point of time in near future Bond Market will revolt and that is when populism devolves into anarchy.

Who Doesn’t Like an Advent Calendar?

361 Capital writes…..Unfortunately the negative market influences continue to pile up on the negative side of the ledger. As a result, Santa still likes you but he hates your investment portfolio this year. Here is what Santa has hidden behind the doors of the 2018 Investment Portfolio Advent Calendar this year…
1- “I am Tariff Man”
2- Huawei CFO Retreat
3- An exiting John Kelly
4- S&P 500 Death Cross
5- Broken Brexit
6- Fruitcake
7- A Yellow Vest of Paris
8- Robert Mueller Schedules a Press Conference
9- A Border Wall or Government Shutdown
10- Some More Fed Tightening
11- M. Cohen & Affair Hush Money
12- Raiders vs. Niners
13- Global Growth Slowdown
14- A Flat/Inverted Yield Curve
15- Further Credit Deterioration
16- M. Cohen & Trump Tower Moscow
17- Financial Stock Underperformance
18- Another Netflix Holiday Special
19- Falling Home Sales
20- Bitcoin Liquidations
21- Khashoggi/MBS/Jared
22- An Oil Bear Market
23- A Volatility Index > 20
24 – 2019 Profit Margin Uncertainty
25- A Stocking Full of GE, DB & GM

Read full article below

https://361capital.com/weekly-briefing/who-doesnt-like-an-advent-calendar/?utm_source=wrb&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=12102018&utm_content=p

Citi Warns U.S. Credit Locked in a Losing ‘Internecine’ Battle

Citigroup Inc. is warning the heart of the U.S. corporate bond market looks braced for its biggest test since the crisis as a backlash over leverage fuels an “internecine battle” that harms borrowers and lenders alike.
High-grade non-financial companies have seen their total debt burdens rise 10 percent year-on-year since 2010 — double the 5 percent growth rate of their earnings. The backdrop for Corporate America’s debt now looks “foreboding” as foreign investors beat a retreat, according to Citi.

Credit outlook
Citi is recommending investors to snap up credits of issuers that are deleveraging amid the 2019 turning point.